Tragedy

Child Abuse In The Church — Taking The Gloves Off

Child Abuse In The Church — Taking The Gloves Off

"Boston Globe", "Life" Issues, "Spotlight" (movie), activism, anger, awareness, betrayal, Challenge, Change, Child Abuse, Christian Church, citizenship, civics, conflict, conservatism, constitution, courage, Criminal Procedure, critical judgment, Episcopacy, Ethics, Evidence, faithfulness, First Amendment, God, Ideology, Incarceration, injustice, justice, law, Religion, resentment, Secularity, self-serving, separation of Church and State, sorrow, Theodicy, Theology, Tragedy, trust, Uncategorized
This is going to sound really strange coming from me, i.e., coming from someone who has been a life-long fairly radical devotee of the First Amendment, in particular, of both the Amendment’s religion clauses:  the “establishment” clause and the “free exercise” clause. But the recent publication of the grand jury’s findings regarding six Pennsylvania dioceses in the matter of priest pedophilia has caused me to radically reassess my attitude toward the latter clause, especially given  that two of the six dioceses in question attempted to have judges quash the grand jury proceedings. In particular, I now believe that, for the most part and because of an arguably well-intentioned but exaggerated deference toward the “free exercise” clause, the Nation has pretty much allowed the Church to r
Theodicy as Moral Plagiarism

Theodicy as Moral Plagiarism

"Life" Issues, Abrahamic Traditions, autonomy, awareness, C. S. Lewis, Cherry picking, Christian Church, Christianity, Comfort, comforter, community, Compassion, conflict, critical judgment, culture, Discernment, doubt, empathy, Ethics, faith, Fear, God, Holy Mystery, Human Condition, mindfulness, monotheism, Myth, Ockham's Razor, parable, Religion, Theodicy, Theology, Tragedy, Uncategorized
It will probably come as no great surprise to you if you have read even a few of my “Skeptics” columns over the years, but I have scant regard for theology. When it comes to the specific field, not of theology in general, but the sub-discipline of theodicy in particular, my “regard quotient” craters out all the way to zero.  I admit to being perversely fascinated by theodicy, if only because theodicy has historically illustrated the tortuous twists and turns of which the human intellect is capable when the thinker desperately attempts to avoid concluding “4” from “2 plus 2”, the intellectual equivalent of watching a python swallow a full-grown goat whole. Maybe mildly perverse, like binge-ing out on Quentin Tarantino movies over a weekend. But mostly harmless. Except … one of the most
Horst Wessel Meets The Three Stooges

Horst Wessel Meets The Three Stooges

activism, anger, autonomy, awareness, bigotry, Challenge, citizenship, civics, Civil War, Compassion, conflict, conservatism, constitution, courage, critical judgment, culture, Current Events, Discernment, Equality, faithfulness, Fascism, Fear, Fearless, First Amendment, Freedom, Fundamentalism, hate, Ideology, immigration, injustice, justice, law, Minorities, Muslims, Nihilism, Pain and Suffering, Presidency, race, racism, Rationality, Secularity, social justice, terrorism, Tragedy, Trump, Uncategorized, VA, violence
I am learning – the hard way – to get knee-jerkingly suspicious every time someone mentions the phrase “moral equivalency” – and certainly when anyone attempts to employ moral equivalency in arguments. I suppose there are occasions when that term, and that rhetorical tactic, are justified, but I have not encountered any examples lately, least of all examples in real life. In fact, I would even make bold to say that at least 90% of the time – and I mean for that number to be interpreted quite literally – entities and acts that are said to be “morally equivalent” are anything but.  Most of the time “morally equivalency” could be more accurately rephrased as “moral imbecility”.  Two examples leap to mine immediately. President Trump – two words that make about as much sense when us