If you get into hollow discussions, your mind will be scattered and you will be unable to attain liberation. You should immediately leave behind a scattered mind and hollow discussions. If you wish to attain the joy of serenity, you need to cure the sickness of hollow discussions. — Buddha's Last Teaching Photo credit: "emptiness," Ghost of Kuji, 2006.
"Boston Globe", "Life" Issues, "Spotlight" (movie), anger, awareness, betrayal, bible, bible, Character of God, Child Abuse, Christianity/Catholicism, Church, conservatism, courage, critical judgment, culture, Ethics, faith, God, monotheism, Secularity, sorrow, Uncategorized
Yeah … I guess I must … anyway … as I have said before, when I was taking both secular philosophy (ethics at a secular university) and moral theology (at a Jesuit school, Seattle University), I was taught, in different ways and in different dialects, that Knowledge plus Power equals Responsibility. I.e., if I know that a given situation is morally wrong and if I have the power to effect change, then I am morally responsible for acting so as to alter the situation and right the wrong. And, moreover, the degree of responsibility varies directly with the scope of my knowledge and my power to effect that change. E.g., there is not much I can do to alleviate the plight of Syrian refugees. Maybe all I can do is to give money. But I am obligated to do at least that much. Given how wides
"Boston Globe", "Life" Issues, "Spotlight" (movie), activism, anger, awareness, betrayal, Challenge, Change, Child Abuse, Christian Church, citizenship, civics, conflict, conservatism, constitution, courage, Criminal Procedure, critical judgment, Episcopacy, Ethics, Evidence, faithfulness, First Amendment, God, Ideology, Incarceration, injustice, justice, law, Religion, resentment, Secularity, self-serving, separation of Church and State, sorrow, Theodicy, Theology, Tragedy, trust, Uncategorized
This is going to sound really strange coming from me, i.e., coming from someone who has been a life-long fairly radical devotee of the First Amendment, in particular, of both the Amendment’s religion clauses: the “establishment” clause and the “free exercise” clause. But the recent publication of the grand jury’s findings regarding six Pennsylvania dioceses in the matter of priest pedophilia has caused me to radically reassess my attitude toward the latter clause, especially given that two of the six dioceses in question attempted to have judges quash the grand jury proceedings. In particular, I now believe that, for the most part and because of an arguably well-intentioned but exaggerated deference toward the “free exercise” clause, the Nation has pretty much allowed the Church to r