anger

The Question That Dare Not Speak Its Name … Must I Ask It Again?

The Question That Dare Not Speak Its Name … Must I Ask It Again?

"Boston Globe", "Life" Issues, "Spotlight" (movie), anger, awareness, betrayal, bible, bible, Character of God, Child Abuse, Christianity/Catholicism, Church, conservatism, courage, critical judgment, culture, Ethics, faith, God, monotheism, Secularity, sorrow, Uncategorized
Yeah … I guess I must … anyway … as I have said before, when I was taking both secular philosophy (ethics at a secular university) and moral theology (at a Jesuit school, Seattle University), I was taught, in different ways and in different dialects, that Knowledge plus Power equals Responsibility.  I.e., if I know that a given situation is morally wrong and if I have the power to effect change, then I am morally responsible for acting so as to alter the situation and right the wrong. And, moreover, the degree of responsibility varies directly with the scope of my knowledge and my power to effect that change. E.g., there is not much I can do to alleviate the plight of Syrian refugees. Maybe all I can do is to give money. But I am obligated to do at least that much. Given how wides
Re-Fighting The Battle Of The Teutoburg Forest

Re-Fighting The Battle Of The Teutoburg Forest

activism, anger, autonomy, awareness, betrayal, bigotry, Challenge, Change, Christianity, citizenship, civics, Compassion, conflict, conservatism, constitution, critical judgment, culture, Current Events, election year, Enlightenment, Ethics, Fascism, Ideology, injustice, Jeff Sessions, Nihilism, Politics, progressive politics, Rationality, Secularity, self-serving, sexual assault, Sexuality, Supreme Court, Trump, Uncategorized
I hated saying it the first time, and I hate even more saying it again. The only reason I said it the first time, and the only reason I’m saying it again, is because I think that, for reasons of mental hygiene if nothing else, we progressives / leftists / liberals, i.e., those of us still possessed of a functioning prefrontal cortex, must remain firmly tethered to reality. Besides, in addition to personal hygiene, for the sake of the Nation we dare not follow the fascist-adjacent right, lemming-like, over the cliff of “alternative facts.” So I will swallow the bitter pill and say it yet again: (1) There will be no "blue wave" in November We will more than likely see the usual scenario repeated whereby ... yes, to be sure ... the party holding the White House loses some sea
Cui Bono?

Cui Bono?

"Life" Issues, activism, anger, autonomy, awareness, Challenge, Change, Christianity/Catholicism, citizenship, civics, conflict, conservatism, constitution, critical judgment, culture, Current Events, Discernment, doubt, Ethics, Evidence, injustice, law, political rhetoric, Supreme Court, Women
This will be the shortest “Skeptic’s Collection” column I have written in my six years of writing for Beguine. There is a heuristic rule of thumb that I have never seen employed in comparing the credibility of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford and Judge Brett Kavanaugh. This principle is, as I say, purely a heuristic rule of thumb. That is, it cannot, nor does it profess to, constitute a fundamental evidentiary principle. It proves nothing “beyond a reasonable doubt”. But it is a good hip-pocket question to ask in “he said / she said” situations. It is a simple, two-word Latin expression: Cui bono? Cui bono may be interpreted variously as “Whose value” or “Whose advantage” or “Whose gain”. In this context, “value,” “advantage,” and “gain” should be interpreted as tangible advantage in te